So I found this on Facebook, 'shared' nearly 44,000 times the last I checked.
Since Science is obviously a person, as is indicated by Gervais, I figure she must be weeping right now (because Science has feelings and is insecure and always needs to be one up on Religion - that pesky & incovenient cousin). She's probably distraught over how folks make such unscientific & simplistic arguments to defend her virtue (like arguments of Religion that folks use to defend the virtue of the ladies).
I can't be sure, but if Science were anything like me (and she's got to be, right?) she'd be wondering why these mullahs of Atheism forget this: the gun used to shoot the child in her head for wanting to go to school was created by Science, designed expressly for shooting at living things. In that sense, culpability - in varying degrees - lies with both parties.
Science doesn't like to be told things like this - especially when she's trying so hard to trump Religion using the platform of logic.
And because she knows there are plenty of great ones, she wishes these defenders of hers would get a better argument.
Carl Sagan on Charlie Rose (at 7:45 he talks about religion):